Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> > v2: >> > - Fix malformed tags in commit body. (checkpatch still complains about >> > missing Close tag, but the bug tracker is not public and I don't have >> > the exact URL) >> >> Just out of curiosity why does the checkpatch complain about a missing >> Close tag? I don't get it why there should be one. > > I am on top of v6.6-rc3. I get: > > $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -g HEAD^..HEAD > WARNING: Prefer a maximum 75 chars per line (possible unwrapped commit description?) > #26: > best ____________rate__________ ____statistics___ _____last____ ______sum-of________ > > WARNING: Reported-by: should be immediately followed by Closes: with a URL to the report > #57: > Reported-by: Alexandr Suslenko <suslenko.o@ajax.systems> > Co-developed-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx> > [...] Ah, thanks. Now I understand. But that rule doesn't make any sense to me, for example I get reports privately as well and add a Reported-by without a Closes tag. So always feel free to ignore that checkpatch warning. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
