Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Hi Kalle,
>
> On Wednesday 4 October 2023 12:20:12 CEST Kalle Valo wrote:
>>
>> Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> > The WF200 allow to start two network interfaces (one AP, one station) on
>> > two different channels. Since magic does not exist, it only works if the
>> > station interface enables power save.
>> >
>> > Thus, the driver detects this case and enforce power save as necessary.
>> >
>> > This patch fixes the case where the AP interface is stopped and it is no
>> > more necessary to enforce power saving on the station interface.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/net/wireless/silabs/wfx/sta.c | 5 +++++
>> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/silabs/wfx/sta.c b/drivers/net/wireless/silabs/wfx/sta.c
>> > index 626dfb4b7a55d..9c0a11c277e97 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/silabs/wfx/sta.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/silabs/wfx/sta.c
>> > @@ -402,7 +402,12 @@ void wfx_stop_ap(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
>> > struct ieee80211_bss_conf *link_conf)
>> > {
>> > struct wfx_vif *wvif = (struct wfx_vif *)vif->drv_priv;
>> > + struct wfx_dev *wdev = wvif->wdev;
>> >
>> > + wvif = NULL;
>> > + while ((wvif = wvif_iterate(wdev, wvif)) != NULL)
>> > + wfx_update_pm(wvif);
>>
>> Isn't the assignment of wvif to NULL unnecessary as in the next line we
>> assign it to again?
>
> wvif is also passed as argument to wvif_iterate(). wvif_iterate() uses this
> parameter to know where the iteration has stopped on previous call.
Ah, I missed that.
> However, the assignation during the declaration of wvif is useless.
Indeed, missed that as well.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
