Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> The WF200 allow to start two network interfaces (one AP, one station) on
> two different channels. Since magic does not exist, it only works if the
> station interface enables power save.
>
> Thus, the driver detects this case and enforce power save as necessary.
>
> This patch fixes the case where the AP interface is stopped and it is no
> more necessary to enforce power saving on the station interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/silabs/wfx/sta.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/silabs/wfx/sta.c b/drivers/net/wireless/silabs/wfx/sta.c
> index 626dfb4b7a55d..9c0a11c277e97 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/silabs/wfx/sta.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/silabs/wfx/sta.c
> @@ -402,7 +402,12 @@ void wfx_stop_ap(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
> struct ieee80211_bss_conf *link_conf)
> {
> struct wfx_vif *wvif = (struct wfx_vif *)vif->drv_priv;
> + struct wfx_dev *wdev = wvif->wdev;
>
> + wvif = NULL;
> + while ((wvif = wvif_iterate(wdev, wvif)) != NULL)
> + wfx_update_pm(wvif);
Isn't the assignment of wvif to NULL unnecessary as in the next line we
assign it to again?
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
