On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Sujith <m.sujith@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >>> > From the original log: >>> > ath5k_pci 0000:01:00.0: registered as '' >>> >>> That comes from >>> >>> dev_info(&pdev->dev, "registered as '%s'\n", wiphy_name(hw->wiphy)); >>> >>> which means that may be buggy too as wiphy_name() gets >>> >>> return wiphy->dev.bus_id; >>> >>> and we only have set at that point wiphy->dev.parent IIRC. >>> >> >> Nope, parent is set after that call in SET_IEEE80211_DEV() >> phy[x] gets assigned in alloc_hw(). >> >> So why is it NULL even if alloc_hw() succeeds ? > > Parent is wiphy->dev.parent not wiphy->dev though So I'm at work for another 4 or 5 hours, but I should have a chance to hack at anything tonight you guys want me to. Let me know if the earlier suggestions in this thread still apply. -Dan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
