> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Lo <kevlo@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, June 9, 2023 3:38 PM
> To: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [PATCH] wifi: rtw89: use the correct bit in the R_AX_PLE_INI_STATUS register
>
> Use the PLE_MGN_INI_RDY bit rather than WDE_MGN_INI_RDY to check if
> PLE cfg ready runs into a timeout.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Lo <kevlo@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c
> index 512de491a064..4e0cec7c59a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c
> @@ -1814,7 +1814,7 @@ static int dle_init(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, enum rtw89_qta_mode mode,
> }
>
> ret = read_poll_timeout(rtw89_read32, ini,
> - (ini & WDE_MGN_INI_RDY) == WDE_MGN_INI_RDY, 1,
> + (ini & PLE_MGN_INI_RDY) == PLE_MGN_INI_RDY, 1,
Luckily, definitions of WDE_MGN_INI_RDY and PLE_MGN_INI_RDY are the same, so
I don't really need to verify it.
> 2000, false, rtwdev, R_AX_PLE_INI_STATUS);
> if (ret) {
> rtw89_err(rtwdev, "[ERR]PLE cfg ready\n");
>
>
> ------Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
