On 2/27/23 11:28, Kalle Valo wrote:
Ganapathi Kondraju <ganapathi.kondraju@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Silicon Labs acquired Redpine Signals recently. It needs to continue
giving support to the existing REDPINE WIRELESS DRIVER. This patch adds
new Maintainers for it.
Signed-off-by: Ganapathi Kondraju <ganapathi.kondraju@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
V2:
- Add proper prefix for patch subject.
- Reorder the maintainers list alphabetically.
- Add a new member to the list.
---
V3:
- Fix sentence formation in the patch subject and description.
---
MAINTAINERS | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index ea941dc..04a08c7 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -17709,8 +17709,14 @@ S: Maintained
F: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/
REDPINE WIRELESS DRIVER
+M: Amol Hanwate <amol.hanwate@xxxxxxxxxx>
+M: Ganapathi Kondraju <ganapathi.kondraju@xxxxxxxxxx>
+M: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx>
+M: Narasimha Anumolu <narasimha.anumolu@xxxxxxxxxx>
+M: Shivanadam Gude <shivanadam.gude@xxxxxxxxxx>
+M: Srinivas Chappidi <srinivas.chappidi@xxxxxxxxxx>
L: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-S: Orphan
+S: Maintained
F: drivers/net/wireless/rsi/
For me six maintainers is way too much. Just last November I marked this
driver as orphan, I really do not want to add all these people to
MAINTAINERS and never hear from them again.
Ideally I would prefer to have one or two maintainers who would be
actively working with the drivers. And also I would like to see some
proof (read: reviewing patches and providing feedback) that the
maintainers are really parciticiping in upstream before changing the
status.
Has there been any progress on improving this driver maintainership
since this patch ?
