Ganapathi Kondraju <ganapathi.kondraju@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Silicon Labs acquired Redpine Signals recently. It needs to continue > giving support to the existing REDPINE WIRELESS DRIVER. This patch adds > new Maintainers for it. > > Signed-off-by: Ganapathi Kondraju <ganapathi.kondraju@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > V2: > - Add proper prefix for patch subject. > - Reorder the maintainers list alphabetically. > - Add a new member to the list. > --- > V3: > - Fix sentence formation in the patch subject and description. > --- > > MAINTAINERS | 8 +++++++- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index ea941dc..04a08c7 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -17709,8 +17709,14 @@ S: Maintained > F: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/ > > REDPINE WIRELESS DRIVER > +M: Amol Hanwate <amol.hanwate@xxxxxxxxxx> > +M: Ganapathi Kondraju <ganapathi.kondraju@xxxxxxxxxx> > +M: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx> > +M: Narasimha Anumolu <narasimha.anumolu@xxxxxxxxxx> > +M: Shivanadam Gude <shivanadam.gude@xxxxxxxxxx> > +M: Srinivas Chappidi <srinivas.chappidi@xxxxxxxxxx> > L: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > -S: Orphan > +S: Maintained > F: drivers/net/wireless/rsi/ For me six maintainers is way too much. Just last November I marked this driver as orphan, I really do not want to add all these people to MAINTAINERS and never hear from them again. Ideally I would prefer to have one or two maintainers who would be actively working with the drivers. And also I would like to see some proof (read: reviewing patches and providing feedback) that the maintainers are really parciticiping in upstream before changing the status. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
