Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 09:03 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >> It seems that we mostly get netdev CCed on wireless patches >> which are written by people who don't know any better and >> CC everything that get_maintainers spits out. Rather than >> patches which indeed could benefit from general networking >> review. >> >> Marking them down in patchwork as Awaiting Upstream is >> a bit tedious. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> CC: kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx >> CC: johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> CC: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> Is this okay with everyone? >> > > Yeah, makes sense. > > Acked-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> I didn't even know about 'X', a very good idea: Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx> -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
