It seems that we mostly get netdev CCed on wireless patches which are written by people who don't know any better and CC everything that get_maintainers spits out. Rather than patches which indeed could benefit from general networking review. Marking them down in patchwork as Awaiting Upstream is a bit tedious. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> --- CC: kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx CC: johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Is this okay with everyone? It's not a big deal, but it really feels that for wireless we only get bot/autogenerated patches to netdev.. Here's the list of patches we marked as Awaiting Upstream: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?delegate=netdev¶m=-date&order=date&state=8 --- MAINTAINERS | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 58239fbc7007..4c49f4703a18 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -14565,6 +14565,7 @@ T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ F: drivers/connector/ F: drivers/net/ +X: drivers/net/wireless/ F: include/dt-bindings/net/ F: include/linux/etherdevice.h F: include/linux/fcdevice.h -- 2.40.1
