Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c >> @@ -7464,6 +7464,8 @@ static int rtl8xxxu_probe(struct usb_interface *interface, >> >> hw->wiphy->max_scan_ssids = 1; >> hw->wiphy->max_scan_ie_len = IEEE80211_MAX_DATA_LEN; >> + if (priv->fops->max_sta_num) >> + hw->wiphy->max_ap_assoc_sta = priv->fops->max_sta_num - 1; > > The way you use it, "max_macid_num" would be a more accurate name. Indeed. I was first wondering why subtract max_sta_num, at least for me max_macid_num makes more sense. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
