Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@xxxxxxx> writes:
> Simon Horman <simon.horman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>>> - for (i = 0; i < NUM_STATUS_READS; i++) {
>>> - if (queue < 6)
>>> - dma_dbg_chain = REG_READ(ah, AR_DMADBG_4);
>>> - else
>>> - dma_dbg_chain = REG_READ(ah, AR_DMADBG_5);
>>> + if (queue < 6) {
>>> + dbg_reg = AR_DMADBG_4;
>>> + reg_offset = i * 5;
>>
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> unless my eyes are deceiving me, i is not initialised here.
>
> Nice catch! Hmm, I wonder why my test compile didn't complain about
> that? Or maybe it did and I overlooked it? Anyway, Kalle, I already
> delegated this patch to you in patchwork, so please drop it
Ok, will drop.
> and I'll try to do better on reviewing the next one :)
No worries, reviewing is hard and things always slip past. But great
that we now have more people reviewing, thanks Simon for catching this.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
