On 4/3/2023 3:51 PM, Aloka Dixit wrote:
Add new parameters and prepare the association data for an EHT peer.
MCS data uses the format described in IEEE P802.11be/D2.0, May 2022,
9.4.2.313.4, convert it into the format expected by the firmware.
+ case IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_320:
+ bw = &eht_cap->eht_mcs_nss_supp.bw._320;
+ ath12k_mac_set_eht_mcs(bw->rx_tx_mcs9_max_nss,
+ bw->rx_tx_mcs9_max_nss,
+ bw->rx_tx_mcs11_max_nss,
+ bw->rx_tx_mcs13_max_nss,
+ &rx_mcs[WMI_EHTCAP_TXRX_MCS_NSS_IDX_320],
+ &tx_mcs[WMI_EHTCAP_TXRX_MCS_NSS_IDX_320]);
+ arg->peer_eht_mcs_count++;
+ fallthrough;
+
+ case IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_160:
+ bw = &eht_cap->eht_mcs_nss_supp.bw._160;
+ ath12k_mac_set_eht_mcs(bw->rx_tx_mcs9_max_nss,
+ bw->rx_tx_mcs9_max_nss,
+ bw->rx_tx_mcs11_max_nss,
+ bw->rx_tx_mcs13_max_nss,
+ &rx_mcs[WMI_EHTCAP_TXRX_MCS_NSS_IDX_160],
+ &tx_mcs[WMI_EHTCAP_TXRX_MCS_NSS_IDX_160]);
+ fallthrough;
+
'arg->peer_eht_mcs_count++' is missing for 160 MHz case.
Should I send a follow-up now for the series or wait for comments on the
remaining part for some time.
Thanks.
