On 3/1/2023 12:53 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2023-03-01 at 12:49 -0800, Jacob Keller wrote: >> >> I can drop this one out of the series if you don't have an intention of >> taking it, or I can refactor to just use size_add and array_size without >> converting it to flexible array, which would prevent that coccinelle >> patch from complaining and at least ensure that we can't overflow size >> and under-allocate. >> >> Do you have a preference? >> > > Ah, it's up to Kalle, not me :-) > > I think it's OK to do, and if it gets rid of drive-by submissions from > the coccinelle patch later, I guess it's better to take it now. And you > already have it anyway. > > I might prefer though if you sent the drivers and cfg80211 patches > separately, since that's usually Kalle vs. me applying it, and if it's > in a same series we tend to end up wondering if there's a dependency or > something, which is clearly not the case here. > > johannes Sure. I'll send them separately in v2. Thanks, Jake
