On Wed, 2023-03-01 at 12:49 -0800, Jacob Keller wrote: > > I can drop this one out of the series if you don't have an intention of > taking it, or I can refactor to just use size_add and array_size without > converting it to flexible array, which would prevent that coccinelle > patch from complaining and at least ensure that we can't overflow size > and under-allocate. > > Do you have a preference? > Ah, it's up to Kalle, not me :-) I think it's OK to do, and if it gets rid of drive-by submissions from the coccinelle patch later, I guess it's better to take it now. And you already have it anyway. I might prefer though if you sent the drivers and cfg80211 patches separately, since that's usually Kalle vs. me applying it, and if it's in a same series we tend to end up wondering if there's a dependency or something, which is clearly not the case here. johannes
