Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino wrote: > Hi guys, > > If I do a 'rmmod eeepc-laptop', while connected to my AP, I get the > following error messages from ath5k: > > """ > ath5k phy0: noise floor calibration timeout (2417MHz) > ath5k phy0: failed to wakeup the MAC Chip > ath5k phy0: can't reset hardware (-5) > ath5k phy0: failed to wakeup the MAC Chip > ath5k phy0: can't reset hardware (-5) > wlan0: No ProbeResp from current AP 00:1d:0f:e9:c7:c0 - assume out of range > ath5k phy0: failed to wakeup the MAC Chip > ath5k phy0: ath5k_chan_set: unable to reset channel (2412 Mhz) > wlan0: failed to set freq to 2412 MHz for scan > ath5k phy0: failed to wakeup the MAC Chip > ath5k phy0: ath5k_chan_set: unable to reset channel (2417 Mhz) > wlan0: failed to set freq to 2417 MHz for scan > ath5k phy0: failed to wakeup the MAC Chip > ath5k phy0: ath5k_chan_set: unable to reset channel (2422 Mhz) > wlan0: failed to set freq to 2422 MHz for scan > ath5k phy0: failed to wakeup the MAC Chip > ath5k phy0: ath5k_chan_set: unable to reset channel (2427 Mhz) > wlan0: failed to set freq to 2427 MHz for scan > ath5k phy0: failed to wakeup the MAC Chip > ath5k phy0: ath5k_chan_set: unable to reset channel (2432 Mhz) > wlan0: failed to set freq to 2432 MHz for scan > wlan0: failed to set freq to 2437 MHz for scan > wlan0: failed to set freq to 2442 MHz for scan > wlan0: failed to set freq to 2447 MHz for scan > wlan0: failed to set freq to 2452 MHz for scan > wlan0: failed to set freq to 2457 MHz for scan > wlan0: failed to set freq to 2462 MHz for scan > wlan0: failed to set freq to 2467 MHz for scan > wlan0: failed to set freq to 2472 MHz for scan > wlan0: failed to set freq to 2484 MHz for scan > wlan0: failed to restore operational channel after scan > wlan0: authenticate with AP 00:1d:0f:e9:c7:c0 > wlan0: authenticate with AP 00:1d:0f:e9:c7:c0 > wlan0: authenticate with AP 00:1d:0f:e9:c7:c0 > wlan0: authentication with AP 00:1d:0f:e9:c7:c0 timed out > """ > > Then I lost my wireless connection. > > I'm running latest Linus git tree (2.6.28-rc2) on a Eeepc 701. > > The problem doesn't happen on 2.6.27.4, but as 2.6.28-rc1 doesn't > boot on this machine, it would be a bit difficult to bisect it. > > Thanks. > The trick with bisection is to identify the fix, use "git cherry-pick" to apply it before testing, and then "git reset --hard HEAD^" to unapply the fix before "git bisect {good|bad}". But you shouldn't need to bisect. It'll be the addition of rfkill support (see below). Matthew: I nagged you twice about different consequences of this commit, so here's a third :). You said rfkill no longer automatically frobs on suspend/resume, which was what I was worried about last time. Should the core code also be modified so it doesn't do anything when the rfkill device is unregistered? Thanks Alan --- commit a195dcdcff33b8ef01a23cbc489fdfcdfa28c88e Author: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue Aug 19 12:13:20 2008 +0100 eeepc-laptop: Use standard interfaces eeepc-laptop currently only sends key events via ACPI and has non-standard rfkill control. Add an input device and use the rfkill infrastructure. Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html