On 1/20/2023 1:20 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
Hi Aloka,
Secondly, this RFC uses ieee80211_valid_disable_subchannel_bitmap()
defined in following RFC you sent:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20220325140859.e48bf244f157.I3547481d49f958389f59dfeba3fcc75e72b0aa6e@changeid/
Yes, I saw that.
Is there is any plan for the next version?
Am I correct that by basing your work here on top of that, you're OK
with that being included, and we've concluded the discussion about where
and how the puncturing bitmap should be stored? This patchset was an
RFC, I'm personally happy with the design, but really also want to hear
your opinion and perspective on it.
Anyway if that's the case then I'll go and resubmit the patch - we also
made some more fixes to it since, I think. I'm not sure I'll get to it
today, but I'll do it soon.
johannes
Yes, we are okay with the bitmap being part of the bss_conf/link_conf.
Please send the new version with fixes as soon as you can, I'm still
looking into your comments regarding the design Muna sent.
