Hi Aloka, > Secondly, this RFC uses ieee80211_valid_disable_subchannel_bitmap() > defined in following RFC you sent: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20220325140859.e48bf244f157.I3547481d49f958389f59dfeba3fcc75e72b0aa6e@changeid/ Yes, I saw that. > Is there is any plan for the next version? Am I correct that by basing your work here on top of that, you're OK with that being included, and we've concluded the discussion about where and how the puncturing bitmap should be stored? This patchset was an RFC, I'm personally happy with the design, but really also want to hear your opinion and perspective on it. Anyway if that's the case then I'll go and resubmit the patch - we also made some more fixes to it since, I think. I'm not sure I'll get to it today, but I'll do it soon. johannes
