On January 13, 2023 2:35:58 PM Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:[ 104.897615] brcmfmac: cfg80211_set_channel: set chanspec 0x100e fail, reason -52[...]All of these 10 errors are repeated every 60 sec.Catching up after the holidays ;-) Above chanspec values are invalid. 0x100e = channel 14/bw 20MHz. The 'iw list' output shows all these channels are disabled. So who/what is trying to set these channels. Scanning sets the channel in firmware. Is this initiated from hostapd?Yeah, what userspace is running here? Looks like cfg80211_set_channel() is only used for survey? Couple of observations on the side: * might be nice to have some "brcm" indication in that name :PIndeed, having a function cfg80211_set_channel() in brcmfmac/cfg80211.c is VERY misleading. I first though that is a cfg80211 function and didn't understand Johannes' comment until I started grepping :) Can someone fix that, please?
It is already on your queue for wireless-next. That was the 3rd patch for which you sent yourself a reminder earlier this week. You remember? ;-p
Gr. AvS
-- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature