On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 16:39 +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Johannes Berg > <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 15:23 +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Johannes Berg > >> <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > This fixes the basic rate bitmap calculation in mac80211. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx [2.6.25, 2.6.26, 2.6.27] > >> > --- > >> > Is this appropriate for stable? It's a trivial and obvious fix, and can > >> > throw off the duration calculation, but it's likely nobody will ever > >> > really notice... > >> > >> You would should fail association if one of the basic rates is not > >> supported by the station > > > > No, this has nothing to do with association, it's just setting the > > internal variable about which rates are basic in the BSS. > > I understand that but What your patch is doing it is preventing > of setting basic rates for ratest that are not sported by the driver, > but according > the spec it is not permissible that driver will not support one of the > basic rates. I don't understand. My patch is simply fixing the basic rate bitmap calculation. If we don't support all basic rates then the AP shall have denied the association, or we probably didn't even ask it. The current code there is just wrong, it will always set _all_ rates in the basic rate bitmap rather than just those that really are basic rates. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
