"Nick Kossifidis" <mickflemm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2008/10/29 Elias Oltmanns <eo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> > >> Right, so here is another attempt. Unfortunately, in 2.6.27 no constants >> have been defined for the phy revisions, nor the 0xa228 register and the >> bit masks involved in resetting this register. Perhaps we should consult >> the stable team on this matter because the minimal approach, as >> presented below, certainly lacks even the smallest degree of readability >> even though we actually know reasonably well what we are doing here. The >> changelog, by the way, will be adapted to quote your changeset fixing >> this in mainline once it has been committed. What do you think? >> > > Patch looks OK, thanks a lot ;-) > > John can we get this get in stable until i update reset.c on wireless-testing ? > Would it be possible later to update mainline from wireless-testing ? Reading Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt, I very much doubt that this patch will go in unless we can at least point out something equivalent in mainline. So, we'll have to wait until your changes to reset.c have reached mainline, I'm afraid. Regards, Elias -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
