> Hi Ilan/Andrei, > > Will you send your patches of wpa_supplicant for MLO to upstream?😁 Hi, Yeah, sorry, still WIP. We've been on a long holidays period until yesterday. Andrei > > On 10/11/2022 10:28 AM, Wen Gong wrote: > > Hi Ilan/Andrei, > > > > Will you send your patches of wpa_supplicant to upstream?😁 > > > > On 9/28/2022 11:12 PM, Wen Gong wrote: > >> On 9/12/2022 9:17 PM, Otcheretianski, Andrei wrote: > >>>>> Well, OK, you obviously are adjusting the supplicant to work with > >>>>> MLO (otherwise you wouldn't get an MLO connection in the first > >>>>> place), so yeah, this is part of the adjustments needed. > >>>>> > >>>>> Ilan/Andrei have all of this working, maybe we can share the > >>>>> patches even before rebase etc. > >>> Hi, > >>> Our implementation is based on our internal tree, so it will take > >>> some time to cleanup and port it for upstream. > >>> Hopefully I will have some time to work on it this and next week and > >>> maybe we will be able to share something initial. > >> May I get your patches? > >>> > >>> Andrei > >>>>> johannes > >>>> Thanks. > >>>> > >>>> It is good to share me the wpa_supplicant patches ASAP. > >>>> > >>>> And I have another question: > >>>> > >>>> When mac80211 use the MLD addr in authentication/assoc request, > >>>> > >>>> finally, it should be replaced with one link's address in air port, > >>>> right? > >>>> > >>>> It means the MLD addr will never exist in mac80211 header of packet > >>>> in the air port, right?
