Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH 3/7] brcmfmac: add support for vendor-specific firmware api

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/29/2022 11:32 AM, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
On 7/28/2022 11:36 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
aspriel@xxxxxxxxx writes:

The driver is being used by multiple vendors who develop the firmware
api independently. So far the firmware api as used by the driver has
not diverged (yet). This change adds framework for supporting multiple
firmware apis. The vendor-specific support code has to provide a number
of callback operations. Right now it is only attach and detach callbacks
so no real functionality as the api is still common. This code only
adds WCC variant anyway, which is selected for all devices right now.

Reviewed-by: Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieter-paul.giesberts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Franky Lin <franky.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

[...]

--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/Kconfig
@@ -8,6 +8,22 @@ config BRCMFMAC
        interface support. If you choose to build a module, it'll be called
        brcmfmac.ko.

+config BRCMFMAC_VENDOR_MODULES
+    bool "Use vendor-specific modules"
+    depends on BRCMFMAC = m
+    help
+      This option will build separate modules for the vendor-specific
+      firmware support. If not selected the vendor-specific support
+      will be build in brcmfmac.ko.
+
+config BRCMFMAC_VENDOR_WCC
+    bool "Broadcom WCC"
+    default y
+    depends on BRCMFMAC
+        help
+          This option will allow the driver to communicate with devices
+          shipped by Broadcom WCC division.
+

I'm not really a fan of these Kconfig options, I would rather have them
always enabled. Why do we need these options, what would be the use case
when user disables these?

I assume with "always enabled" you mean "drop these options". Obviously I would prefer to keep them. The default will result in a single module with all vendor support built-in, but this allows people to trim down their configuration based on what they have. So the choices are:

1) single module with all vendor support built-in
2) single module with partial vendor support built-in (as needed)

    allows users to select vendor for their specific device not carrying
    stuff they don't need. If they have a Cypress/Infineon device they
    only need support for that.

3) separate vendor support modules loaded as needed during device probe

    build all (or some) vendor support modules and they are loaded into
    memory only when they are needed for the device detected.

Hi Kalle,

I wanted to give this series another try, but the conversation above never came to any conclusion/consensus. Maybe good to finish this before resending?

Regards,
Arend



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux