On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 07:06:29PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 09:47 -0700, Larry Finger wrote: > > > When a utility starts spitting messages that it doesn't understand what the > > kernel is providing _AND_ the commit message does not mention that this will > > happen, can someone be blamed for thinking it is a bug? > > Heh, no, not really. It was fairly obvious us, but I guess we were just > routine-blinded. > > > Clearly this is not a regression. Are there plans to update the wireless utilities? > > I suspect it could just be made to ignore them. Or skip a select few, > but obviously it will never be able to parse all of them... > > johannes Hi, If you want me to understand what it's about, you may want to give me a bit more context. Alternatively, just send me a patch for Wireless Tools, and I'll put it in the next release. Wireless Tools is still maintained and I still do releases, even if I don't put much cycles into it. Have a great day... Jean -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
