On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 09:47 -0700, Larry Finger wrote: > When a utility starts spitting messages that it doesn't understand what the > kernel is providing _AND_ the commit message does not mention that this will > happen, can someone be blamed for thinking it is a bug? Heh, no, not really. It was fairly obvious us, but I guess we were just routine-blinded. > Clearly this is not a regression. Are there plans to update the wireless utilities? I suspect it could just be made to ignore them. Or skip a select few, but obviously it will never be able to parse all of them... johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part