On 7/14/2022 12:04 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 at 01:22, Danny van Heumen <danny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In case of buggy firmware, brcmfmac may perform a hardware reset. If during
reset and subsequent probing an early failure occurs, a memory region is
accidentally double-freed. With hardened memory allocation enabled, this error
will be detected.
- return early where appropriate to skip unnecessary clean-up.
- set '.freezer' pointer to NULL to prevent double-freeing under possible
other circumstances and to re-align result under various different
behaviors of memory allocation freeing.
- correctly claim host on func1 for disabling func2.
- after reset, do not initiate probing immediately, but rely on events.
Given a firmware crash, function 'brcmf_sdio_bus_reset' is called. It calls
'brcmf_sdiod_remove', then follows up with 'brcmf_sdiod_probe' to reinitialize
the hardware. If 'brcmf_sdiod_probe' fails to "set F1 blocksize", it exits
early, which includes calling 'brcmf_sdiod_remove'. In both cases
'brcmf_sdiod_freezer_detach' is called to free allocated '.freezer', which
has not yet been re-allocated the second time.
Stacktrace of (failing) hardware reset after firmware-crash:
Code: b9402b82 8b0202c0 eb1a02df 54000041 (d4210000)
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
kthread+0x154/0x160
worker_thread+0x188/0x504
process_one_work+0x1f4/0x490
brcmf_core_bus_reset+0x34/0x44 [brcmfmac]
brcmf_sdio_bus_reset+0x68/0xc0 [brcmfmac]
brcmf_sdiod_probe+0x170/0x21c [brcmfmac]
brcmf_sdiod_remove+0x48/0xc0 [brcmfmac]
kfree+0x210/0x220
__slab_free+0x58/0x40c
Call trace:
x2 : 0000000000000040 x1 : fffffc00002d2b80 x0 : ffff00000b4aee40
x5 : ffff8000013fa728 x4 : 0000000000000001 x3 : ffff00000b4aee00
x8 : ffff800009967ce0 x7 : ffff8000099bfce0 x6 : 00000006f8005d01
x11: ffff8000099bfce0 x10: 00000000fffff000 x9 : ffff8000083401d0
x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 657a69736b636f6c x12: 6220314620746573
x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000000030
x20: fffffc00002d2ba0 x19: fffffc00002d2b80 x18: 0000000000000000
x23: ffff00000b4aee00 x22: ffff00000b4aee00 x21: 0000000000000001
x26: ffff00000b4aee00 x25: ffff0000f7753705 x24: 000000000001288a
x29: ffff80000a22bbf0 x28: ffff000000401200 x27: 000000008020001a
sp : ffff80000a22bbf0
lr : kfree+0x210/0x220
pc : __slab_free+0x58/0x40c
pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
Workqueue: events brcmf_core_bus_reset [brcmfmac]
Hardware name: Pine64 Pinebook Pro (DT)
CPU: 2 PID: 639 Comm: kworker/2:2 Tainted: G C 5.16.0-0.bpo.4-arm64 #1 Debian 5.16.12-1~bpo11+1
nvmem_rockchip_efuse industrialio_triggered_buffer videodev snd_soc_core snd_pcm_dmaengine kfifo_buf snd_pcm io_domain mc industrialio mt>
Modules linked in: snd_seq_dummy snd_hrtimer snd_seq snd_seq_device nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib nft_reject_inet nf_reje>
Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP
kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:379!
Signed-off-by: Danny van Heumen <danny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I have to admit that, to me, it looks a bit weird to have one driver
instance managing two different SDIO func devices. On the other hand,
I don't know the HW so there might be good reasons for why.
In any case, I want to point out a commit [1] for the mwifiex driver,
which could serve as a good inspiration of how to make use of the
mmc_hw_reset(). For example, one may look at the return code from
mmc_hw_reset() to understand whether the reset will be done
synchronous or asynchronous (via device re-registration).
Thanks, Uffe
Could the API be extended so the caller can request the reset to be
asynchronous.
Regards,
Arend
