On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 01:35 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> + * @is_part_ampdu: set to indicate that the wireless core should should > >> + * treat this frame as part of an AMPDU > > > > I thought we said we could keep the flag instead of moving to the skb > > here? > > That was just because the changes required to add this was too much > for 2.6.27 but since we don't care about this fix in 2.6.27 we can do > whatever is needed to fix this properly. Right, but adding random stuff into skb isn't really "properly" imho. And we don't really need this afaict. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
