Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 12.04.22 11:37, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Philippe Schenker <dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> This reverts commit bf3747ae2e25dda6a9e6c464a717c66118c588c8. >>> >>> This commit introduces a regression on some systems where the kernel is >>> crashing in different locations after a reboot was issued. >>> >>> This issue was bisected on a Thinkpad P14s Gen2 (AMD) with latest firmware. >>> >>> Link: >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/5077a953487275837e81bdf1808ded00b9676f9f.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxx/ >>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Schenker <dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Can I take this to wireless tree? Felix, ack? >> >> I'll also add: >> >> Fixes: bf3747ae2e25 ("mt76: mt7921: enable aspm by default") > > Sorry, stupid questions from the regression tracker: wouldn't this cause > a regression for users of kernel versions post-bf3747ae2e25, as the > power consumption is likely to increase for them? Without having dug > into the backstory much: would disabling ASPM for this particular > machine using a quirk be the better approach? Or are we assuming a lot > of machines are affected? > > Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) > > P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I'm getting a lot of > reports on my table. I can only look briefly into most of them and lack > knowledge about most of the areas they concern. I thus unfortunately > will sometimes get things wrong or miss something important. I hope > that's not the case here; if you think it is, don't hesitate to tell me > in a public reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record > straight. BTW, maybe you could add that boilerplace text after P.S. into the signature (ie. under "-- " line)? That way your mails would more readable and make it more clear that you didn't write the boilerplate text specifically for this mail. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
