On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:15:57PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 16:35 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > > > That doesn't sound like quite the correct behavior. If a channel is > > excluded for regulatory reasons, then I suspect that should govern > > everyone. But if one card just doesn't support a band, I don't see > > why any other cards should be limited by that. > > > > Did I miss something? > > Well, the thing is that the iwlwifi drivers pretend to know the > regulatory domain; thus when a single-band card registers the regulatory > domain, it gets set to just a domain with the single band. Ah, now I see what this is about...thanks! Should there be an "I make no representation of authority" flag in the regulatory maps? -- John W. Linville Linux should be at the core linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx of your literate lifestyle. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
