Search Linux Wireless

Re: New Regulatory Domain Api.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 09:49 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> The real correct behavior here, as the comment also
>> indicates, is we should be doing an intersection between the two
>> regulatory domains and I sent a RFC on a some initial code I had to
>> support such intersection. Until that is not merged we just respect
>> first regulatory request.
>
> Why should the intersection be the correct behavior? In my previous
> example, the intersection of a BG card and an ABG card is the BG bands.
> Why shouldn't the ABG card have the A band support?

Intersection of ABG and BG is BG.

  Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux