On Fri, 2022-02-04 at 20:07 +0530, Veerendranath Jakkam wrote: > > There are some references for NSS > 8, ex: Table 9-33a, P802.11be_D1.3 > hence I used 81. Right, the spec confuses me. In a lot of places it reserves enough space for 8 < NSS <= 16, but then it has e.g. Table 36-40 with 4 bits, but saying "for up to 8 spatial streams" (MU-MIMO). And even for OFDMA it states in a lot of places that the maximum is only 8. > Please let me know if you would like this to be changed to 51 > Nah, don't worry. I think it probably doesn't even really *matter*, we can safely leave it at 81 anyway (I had evidently miscalculated as 80 before, so I was confused). We also already had some patches in this area, and I'm just working on a combination - e.g. in your first patch I don't like the use of FIELD_GET so much, preferring uXX_get_bits(), but Ilan already had patches here that deal with that. For many of the other patches, Ilan and you arrived at a literally bit- identical version of things! So I think I'm going to pick a couple of things from him and a couple of things from you, and send out a combined series. Perhaps later today, if I manage to get it done. Also in your later nl80211 patch I'm thinking we should combine the HE/EHT GI settings etc., there's no point duplicating all the enums, though we might want to do some renaming. Sounds OK? johannes