On Thu, 2021-12-23 at 06:16 +0000, Ajay.Kathat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On 23/12/21 06:44, David Mosberger-Tang wrote: > > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > > > > OK, so I'm nervous about such a large patch series, but it took a lot > > of work to break things down into atomic changes. This should be it > > for the transmit path as far as I'm concerned. > > Thanks David for the efforts to break down the changes. I am still > reviewing and testing the previous series and found some inconsistent > results. I am not sure about the cause of the difference. For some > tests, the throughput is improved(~1Mbps) but for some CI tests, the > throughput is less compared(~1Mbps in same range) to the previous. > Though not observed much difference. There shouldn't be any significant performance regressions. From my observations, +/-1Mbps in throughput is quite possible due to cache- effects. > Now the new patches are added to the same series so it is difficult to > review them in one go. Ah, OK, sorry about that. After the automated error reports, I waited for a day or two and after not seeing any further feedback, I figured it'd be fine to add to the series. I take it that as long as a patch shows up in patchworks with a state==Action required, I should assume the patch is being worked on (or will be worked on). > I have a request, incase there are new patches please include them in > separate series. I'm not planning on adding more patches. --david
