Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> > Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> >
>> > >> Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> > >>
>> > >> >> Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> > Fix a possible idr pkt-id leak if the packet is dropped on tx side
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > Fixes: bd1e3e7b693c ("mt76: introduce packet_id idr")
>> > >> >> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > >> >> > Acked-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@xxxxxxxx>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Patch applied to wireless-drivers.git, thanks.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> 2a9e9857473b mt76: fix possible pktid leak
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Hi Kalle,
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Unfortunately I found a regression introduced by this patch
>> > >> > for mt7663u (and I
>> > >> > guess for mt7921s as well). Do you want me to post a fix or just a v2?
>> > >>
>> > >> I don't rebase my trees, so please post a fix. I was planning to submit
>> > >> a pull request to net tree today, but is this so serious that I should
>> > >> skip that?
>> > >
>> > > I have already tested mt7663u but I do not have mt7921s hw for testing (but the
>> > > behaviour should be the same). I guess we can split the patch, just post the
>> > > fix for mt7663u and let Sean the time to test it on mt7921s (I am not sure
>> > > mt7921s is already available on the market). In this way you can send the PR
>> > > today. What do you think?
>> >
>> > I think it's best to wait, I prefer to have proper build testing on my
>> > tree before I submit the pull request.
>>
>> ack, fine to me. Let's wait for Sean in this case.
>
> @Sean: if you want to test the code the patch is available here:
> https://github.com/LorenzoBianconi/wireless-drivers/commit/1ffda36c7cbe3a6cfc31868895417d0cd6755306
And if we can't find a quick fix let's just revert 2a9e9857473b. I can't
wait too long.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
