> > Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> > >> Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > >>
> > >> >> Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > Fix a possible idr pkt-id leak if the packet is dropped on tx side
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Fixes: bd1e3e7b693c ("mt76: introduce packet_id idr")
> > >> >> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >> >> > Acked-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@xxxxxxxx>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Patch applied to wireless-drivers.git, thanks.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> 2a9e9857473b mt76: fix possible pktid leak
> > >> >
> > >> > Hi Kalle,
> > >> >
> > >> > Unfortunately I found a regression introduced by this patch for mt7663u (and I
> > >> > guess for mt7921s as well). Do you want me to post a fix or just a v2?
> > >>
> > >> I don't rebase my trees, so please post a fix. I was planning to submit
> > >> a pull request to net tree today, but is this so serious that I should
> > >> skip that?
> > >
> > > I have already tested mt7663u but I do not have mt7921s hw for testing (but the
> > > behaviour should be the same). I guess we can split the patch, just post the
> > > fix for mt7663u and let Sean the time to test it on mt7921s (I am not sure
> > > mt7921s is already available on the market). In this way you can send the PR
> > > today. What do you think?
> >
> > I think it's best to wait, I prefer to have proper build testing on my
> > tree before I submit the pull request.
>
> ack, fine to me. Let's wait for Sean in this case.
@Sean: if you want to test the code the patch is available here:
https://github.com/LorenzoBianconi/wireless-drivers/commit/1ffda36c7cbe3a6cfc31868895417d0cd6755306
Regards,
Lorenzo
>
> Regards,
> Lorenzo
>
> >
> > --
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
> >
> > https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
