On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Steven Noonan <steven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 7:32 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez > <lrodriguez@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez >> <lrodriguez@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> We were trying to hold the wrong spinlock due to a typo >>> on IEEE80211_BAR_CTL_TID_S's definition. We use this to >>> compute the tid number and then hold this this tid number's >>> spinlock. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vasanth@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Sujith <Sujith.Manoharan@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Just a head up John -- Ingo has already sucked this into his tree with >> a proper Reported-by. We still need it in wireless-testing though, not >> sure how that will be handled. >> >> Luis > > Oh, I should add a tested-by for this. > > Tested-by: Steven Noonan <steven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks a lot for testing this Steven, your reports and tests are greatly appreciated. Let us know how ANI goes :) Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
