On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 7:32 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez > <lrodriguez@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> We were trying to hold the wrong spinlock due to a typo >> on IEEE80211_BAR_CTL_TID_S's definition. We use this to >> compute the tid number and then hold this this tid number's >> spinlock. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vasanth@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Sujith <Sujith.Manoharan@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Just a head up John -- Ingo has already sucked this into his tree with > a proper Reported-by. We still need it in wireless-testing though, not > sure how that will be handled. > > Luis Oh, I should add a tested-by for this. Tested-by: Steven Noonan <steven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
