Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 20/10/2021 14:54, Loic Poulain wrote: >> Hi Bryan, Kalle, >> >> On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 at 02:26, Bryan O'Donoghue >> <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On 18/10/2021 23:51, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: >>>> On 18/10/2021 11:57, Loic Poulain wrote: >>>>> ieee80211_is_probe_resp(hdr->frame_control)) >>>>> status.boottime_ns = ktime_get_boottime_ns(); >>>> >>>> I think this is dangling in your tree, doesn't apply cleanly for me anyway >>>> >>>> Other than that >>>> >>>> Tested-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Hmm. >>> >>> I'm told by a colleague with access to a router that has channel 144 - I >>> do not BTW - that 144 is not showing up with the firmware offload scan. >>> >>> We should probably hold off on applying for the time being :( >> >> So the missing channel 144 is due to a different problem, and is now fixed >> in a subsequent patch: >> wcn36xx: Channel list update before hardware scan >> >> So I think we can go with this change :-). >> >> Regards, >> Loic >> > > Cool, nice job I had already dropped this patch from my queue, but added it back now. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
