On 21.09.21 11:20, Kalle Valo wrote: > Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>> Is this not the usual DT policy, that missing optional properties should >>> not prevent a device to work, that old dtbs should still work when new >>> properties are added? >>> >>> I'm not sure what's the best way forward. A plain revert of this patch >>> would at least bring back wifi support for RockPro64 devices with >>> existing dtbs. Maybe someone else has a better proposal how to proceed. >> Go ahead to revert if we do not hear a better solution, I would say. > Yes, please do send a revert. And remember to explain the regression in > the commit log. > I sent a revert patch. Sorry for the delay, Soeren
