Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Is this not the usual DT policy, that missing optional properties should >> not prevent a device to work, that old dtbs should still work when new >> properties are added? >> >> I'm not sure what's the best way forward. A plain revert of this patch >> would at least bring back wifi support for RockPro64 devices with >> existing dtbs. Maybe someone else has a better proposal how to proceed. > > Go ahead to revert if we do not hear a better solution, I would say. Yes, please do send a revert. And remember to explain the regression in the commit log. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
