On 21-08-23 10:23, Brian Norris wrote: > On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 9:49 AM Andrey Skvortsov > <andrej.skvortzov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > 4) As many users are affected by this problem and maintainers don't really > > want to revert the problematic patch, > > I'm not totally sure that's true. So far, it looks like an oversight. > > Over a year ago, Kalle said he "just need[ed] to check something > internally first": > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/87r1rsbdnx.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > I don't see the result of that, except that this is marked Superseded: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20200730124923.271429-1-alsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > and this is marked Rejected: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20200527165718.129307-1-briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx/ > I'm not sure if the Rejected was before or after the last reply above... > > Maybe it needs an Nth person to submit a revert? Later (Dec 23, 2020) said "Actually I don't see how I could apply the revert due to the regulatory problems explained by Jouni". [1] I think this could be the date when your patch was marked as Rejected. 1. http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/ath10k/2020-December/012370.html -- Best regards, Andrey Skvortsov
