On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 9:49 AM Andrey Skvortsov <andrej.skvortzov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 4) As many users are affected by this problem and maintainers don't really > want to revert the problematic patch, I'm not totally sure that's true. So far, it looks like an oversight. Over a year ago, Kalle said he "just need[ed] to check something internally first": https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/87r1rsbdnx.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ I don't see the result of that, except that this is marked Superseded: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20200730124923.271429-1-alsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ and this is marked Rejected: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20200527165718.129307-1-briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx/ I'm not sure if the Rejected was before or after the last reply above... Maybe it needs an Nth person to submit a revert? Brian