On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 3:35 AM Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 04.08.2021 18:34, Linus Walleij пишет: > > + bool tested_board_variant; > > What about s/tested/tried/? OK that is clearer, I fix! > > -static void brcmf_fw_request_done(const struct firmware *fw, void *ctx) > > +static void brcmf_fw_request_done_first(const struct firmware *fw, void *ctx) > > Is it really worthwhile to rename this function? There is no "done_second". It is to reflect the actual use, because it fooled me as it could be interpreted (intuitively) as "this is called when all firmware requests are done" since it doesn't specify. But that is not the case, it is only called when done with the first first firmware in the list. Hence the name change. The philosophy is in line with Rusty Russell's API design hierarchy: http://sweng.the-davies.net/Home/rustys-api-design-manifesto Yours, Linus Walleij
