On Saturday 20 September 2008, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > > > Even if that means a need to > > > get EV_SW SW_WLAN out of Dmitry... I don't know if rt2x000 wants SW_WLAN or > > > SW_RFKILL_ALL. > > > > Not sure either, there is no way to determine which of the 2 should be used. > > Should be an module parameter or runtime (sysfs?) parameter, then... Module parameter sounds best, I doubt people would want to change the value at runtime (when it is just easier to do it at loadtime). > > Oh an to make sure I get it completely right this time: > > When I implement the input polldev, I no longer have to use rfkill_force_state() right? > > Correct. It has nothing to do with the rfkill class part of your driver at > all, since there is no effect on the hardware. It is just an input device > that issues EV_SW events. Ok, thanks. :) I'll remove rfkill from rt2x00, implement input_polldev as seperate module, move rfkill support into mac80211 to make mac80211 drivers automatically detect the rfkill notifications. Ivo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
