Hi David,
On 24/02/21 9:17 pm, David Mosberger-Tang wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> Ajay,
>
> On Wed, 2021-02-24 at 13:35 +0000, Ajay.Kathat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>> One more observation.
>> I am not clear if the below block is really needed. Have you faced any
>> issue here and did the below logic of skipping data helped to come out
>> of it. Also checking the limit of 16384(2*8KB) byte looks odd when the
>> max limit for data packet is around 8KB. Am I missing something here.
>>
>>> +
>>> + {
>>> + u8 byte;
>>> + int i;
>>> +
>>> + for (i = 0; i < 16384; ++i) {
>>> + byte = 0;
>>> + wilc_spi_rx(wilc, &byte, 1);
>>> + if (!byte)
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>
> Ouch, that's definitely not supposed to be there! It's left-over debug
> code from when I was tracking down the power-save issue. Not sure how
> I missed that. Thanks for catching it and being so gentle about it!
>
> How do I fix this best? Do I resend the entire patch series or is it
> OK to create a V2 of just this last patch?
>
It's better to resubmit the complete patch series v2, as it would be
convenient for Kalle to apply the patches in order.
Regards,
Ajay
