Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > ath10k_drain_tx() must not be called with conf_mutex held as workers can > use that also. Add call to lockdep_assert_not_held() on conf_mutex to > detect if conf_mutex is held by the caller. > > The idea for this patch stemmed from coming across the comment block > above the ath10k_drain_tx() while reviewing the conf_mutex holds during > to debug the conf_mutex lock assert in ath10k_debug_fw_stats_request(). > > Adding detection to assert on conf_mutex hold will help detect incorrect > usages that could lead to locking problems when async worker routines try > to call this routine. > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/871rdmu9z9.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> This can go via the same tree as patch 1: Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> But I can also take this to my ath tree, once patch 1 has reached it. Just let me know what is preferred. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
