Some kernel functions must not be called holding a specific lock. Doing so could lead to locking problems. Currently these routines call lock_is_held() to check for lock hold followed by WARN_ON. Adding a common lockdep interface will help reduce the duplication of this logic in the rest of the kernel. Add lockdep_assert_not_held() to be used in these functions to detect incorrect calls while holding a lock. lockdep_assert_not_held() provides the opposite functionality of lockdep_assert_held() which is used to assert calls that require holding a specific lock. The need for lockdep_assert_not_held() came up in a discussion on ath10k patch. ath10k_drain_tx() and i915_vma_pin_ww() are examples of functions that can use lockdep_assert_not_held(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/871rdmu9z9.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- include/linux/lockdep.h | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h index b9e9adec73e8..567e3a1a27ce 100644 --- a/include/linux/lockdep.h +++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h @@ -294,6 +294,10 @@ extern void lock_unpin_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock, struct pin_cookie); #define lockdep_depth(tsk) (debug_locks ? (tsk)->lockdep_depth : 0) +#define lockdep_assert_not_held(l) do { \ + WARN_ON(debug_locks && lockdep_is_held(l)); \ + } while (0) + #define lockdep_assert_held(l) do { \ WARN_ON(debug_locks && !lockdep_is_held(l)); \ } while (0) @@ -383,8 +387,9 @@ extern int lock_is_held(const void *); extern int lockdep_is_held(const void *); #define lockdep_is_held_type(l, r) (1) +#define lockdep_assert_not_held(l) do { (void)(l); } while (0) #define lockdep_assert_held(l) do { (void)(l); } while (0) -#define lockdep_assert_held_write(l) do { (void)(l); } while (0) +#define lockdep_assert_held_write(l) do { (void)(l); } while (0) #define lockdep_assert_held_read(l) do { (void)(l); } while (0) #define lockdep_assert_held_once(l) do { (void)(l); } while (0) -- 2.27.0
