On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 16:33:37 -0800 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2/3/21 4:30 PM, wengjianfeng wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 07:16:17 -0800 > > Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> On 2/2/21 10:38 PM, samirweng1979 wrote: > >>> From: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> > >>> remove duplicate word 'we' in comment > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> --- > >>> drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c | 2 +- > >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c > >>> b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c index > >>> c861811..7158152 100644 --- > >>> a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c +++ > >>> b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c @@ -179,7 > >>> +179,7 @@ void rt2x00crypto_rx_insert_iv(struct sk_buff *skb, > >>> * Make room for new data. There are 2 possibilities > >>> * either the alignment is already present between > >>> * the 802.11 header and payload. In that case we > >>> - * we have to move the header less then the iv_len > >>> + * have to move the header less then the iv_len > >> > >> s/then/than/ > >> > >>> * since we can use the already available l2pad bytes > >>> * for the iv data. > >>> * When the alignment must be added manually we must > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Hi Randy, > > So you means add it for byte alignment, right? if yes,just ignore > > the patch. thanks. > > No, I mean that there is a typo there also: "then" should be changed > to "than" while you are making changes. > > thanks. Hi Randy£¬ Ok£¬ I¡¡will update the patch£¬thanks for your reply.
