On 2/3/21 4:30 PM, wengjianfeng wrote: > On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 07:16:17 -0800 > Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 2/2/21 10:38 PM, samirweng1979 wrote: >>> From: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> remove duplicate word 'we' in comment >>> >>> Signed-off-by: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c >>> b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c index >>> c861811..7158152 100644 --- >>> a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c +++ >>> b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c @@ -179,7 >>> +179,7 @@ void rt2x00crypto_rx_insert_iv(struct sk_buff *skb, >>> * Make room for new data. There are 2 possibilities >>> * either the alignment is already present between >>> * the 802.11 header and payload. In that case we >>> - * we have to move the header less then the iv_len >>> + * have to move the header less then the iv_len >> >> s/then/than/ >> >>> * since we can use the already available l2pad bytes >>> * for the iv data. >>> * When the alignment must be added manually we must >>> >> >> > > Hi Randy, > So you means add it for byte alignment, right? if yes,just ignore > the patch. thanks. No, I mean that there is a typo there also: "then" should be changed to "than" while you are making changes. thanks. -- ~Randy
