On Mon, 2021-01-18 at 17:18 +0200, Kalle Valo wrote: > Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Luca Coelho <luca@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > There's no reason to use ktime_get() since we don't need any better > > > precision than jiffies, and since we no longer disable interrupts > > > around this code (when grabbing NIC access), jiffies will work fine. > > > Use jiffies instead of ktime_get(). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > What bug does this fix? After reading the commit log to me this looks > > like more like cleanup and is better for -next. > > Ah, this is a dependency for patch 12. I'll mention this in the commit > log, but please correct me if I have misunderstood. Yes, you're right! It's a dependency and I thought it would be simpler and cause less conflicts if I just took it too instead of sending them via different trees. -- Cheers, Luca.
