Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Luca Coelho <luca@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> There's no reason to use ktime_get() since we don't need any better >> precision than jiffies, and since we no longer disable interrupts >> around this code (when grabbing NIC access), jiffies will work fine. >> Use jiffies instead of ktime_get(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx> > > What bug does this fix? After reading the commit log to me this looks > like more like cleanup and is better for -next. Ah, this is a dependency for patch 12. I'll mention this in the commit log, but please correct me if I have misunderstood. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
