On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Tomas Winkler <tomasw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez > <lrodriguez@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez >> <lrodriguez@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> With iwlagn (Intel 4965) on HT40 5GHz using iperf over TCP I get much >> more convincing results (still noisy environment): >> >> mcgrof@pogo ~ $ iperf -s -i1 >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> Server listening on TCP port 5001 >> TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default) >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> [ 4] local 192.168.1.5 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.3 port 41403 >> [ 4] 0.0- 1.0 sec 3.61 MBytes 30.3 Mbits/sec >> [ 4] 1.0- 2.0 sec 1.88 MBytes 15.8 Mbits/sec >> [ 4] 2.0- 3.0 sec 7.56 MBytes 63.4 Mbits/sec >> [ 4] 3.0- 4.0 sec 11.4 MBytes 96.0 Mbits/sec >> [ 4] 4.0- 5.0 sec 10.2 MBytes 85.3 Mbits/sec >> [ 4] 5.0- 6.0 sec 10.4 MBytes 87.0 Mbits/sec >> [ 4] 6.0- 7.0 sec 10.3 MBytes 86.5 Mbits/sec >> [ 4] 7.0- 8.0 sec 10.6 MBytes 88.9 Mbits/sec >> [ 4] 8.0- 9.0 sec 10.3 MBytes 86.5 Mbits/sec >> [ 4] 9.0-10.0 sec 10.6 MBytes 89.0 Mbits/sec >> [ 4] 0.0-10.2 sec 88.6 MBytes 73.1 Mbits/sec >> > Are you sure there is aggregation on the air? In 40Mhz with > aggregation we should be at least 110Mbit or better something around > 150Mbits. This looks like HT rates but no aggregation. I'll ask wireshark. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
